| dc.contributor.author | Beattie Andrew | en_US |
| dc.contributor.editor | en_US | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-08-20T13:51:08Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2009-08-20T13:51:08Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | en_US |
| dc.identifier | 2004005115 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Beattie Andrew 2005, 'The Past In the Politics of Divided and Unified Germany', Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp. 17-38. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1403964556 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | B1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/1318 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The legacies and memories of the past always inform political decisionmaking in the present, but the tumultuous nature of Germany's twentieth-century history has focused considerable attention on the issue of "coming to terms" with the Nazi past (Vergangenheitsbewaltigung). This is a slippery term that encompasses specific attempts to bring Nazi perpetrators to account and seek justice for their victims, as well as a more general effort to face up to and remember the 12-year period of Nazi rule under Adolf Hitler (I933-1945). The highly emotional and morally charged debate about the adequacy of this process has often hindered, and even substituted for sober analysis of the past's role in Germany's postwar politics. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Palgrave MacMillan | en_US |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | en_US | |
| dc.title | The Past In the Politics of Divided and Unified Germany | en_US |
| dc.parent | Partisan Histories: the Past in Contemporary Global Politics | en_US |
| dc.journal.volume | en_US | |
| dc.journal.number | en_US | |
| dc.publocation | New York | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 17 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 38 | en_US |
| dc.cauo.name | IIS | en_US |