| dc.contributor.author | Ying Colin | en_US |
| dc.contributor.editor | John Felemegas | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-16T04:57:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2010-06-16T04:57:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.identifier | 2006014823 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ying Colin 2007, 'Time for delivery and early delivery: comparison between the provisions of CISG Articles 33 and 52(1) and the counterpart provisions of the PECL (Articles 7:102 and 7:103) - Art33/52(1) CISG-PECL', Cambridge, New York, U.S.A, pp. 360-366. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 9780521868723 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | B1 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10453/11770 | |
| dc.description.abstract | en_US | |
| dc.language | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Cambridge | en_US |
| dc.relation.isbasedon | en_US | |
| dc.title | Time for delivery and early delivery: comparison between the provisions of CISG Articles 33 and 52(1) and the counterpart provisions of the PECL (Articles 7:102 and 7:103) - Art33/52(1) CISG-PECL | en_US |
| dc.parent | An International Approach to the Interpretation of UN Convention on Contracts | en_US |
| dc.journal.volume | en_US | |
| dc.journal.number | en_US | |
| dc.publocation | New York, U.S.A | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 360 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 366 | en_US |
| dc.cauo.name | LAW.Faculty of law | en_US |
| dc.conference | Verified OK | en_US |
| dc.for | 180100 | en_US |
| dc.personcode | 770186 | en_US |
| dc.percentage | 000100 | en_US |
| dc.classification.name | Law | en_US |
| dc.classification.type | FOR-08 | en_US |
| dc.edition | 1 | en_US |
| dc.custom | en_US | |
| dc.date.activity | en_US | |
| dc.location.activity | en_US | |
| dc.description.keywords | en_US | |
| dc.staffid | en_US |