<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>UTS Faculty of Business</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/19809</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2013-06-19T15:18:13Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>Regulation View 2009 Benchmark Report about Implementation of Regulations in Organisations</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/19810</link>
<description>Regulation View 2009 Benchmark Report about Implementation of Regulations in Organisations
Hackman, Katarina
This research, the first of its type in Australia, investigates how organisations implement new or&#13;
amended regulations and what influences their approach. Of particular interest is what influences&#13;
organisations to do more than the minimum to comply. This is an important question because&#13;
doing more than the minimum may be necessary to achieve the intent of the regulations, especially&#13;
with the trend to more principles based regulation using risk based assessments.&#13;
The 2009 report focuses on results for two types of regulations in Australia: the core Financial and&#13;
Insurance Services Industry regulations (FIS) and the cross industry Occupational Health &amp; Safety&#13;
regulations (OHS).The results showed that there were significant similarities between the FIS and&#13;
OHS. Implementation of regulations was considered from the perspective of people internal and&#13;
external to organisations. There was significant agreement between these two views.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10453/19810</guid>
<dc:date>2009-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
