<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/203">
<title>General</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/203</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12414"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/11638"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/11626"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/7869"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2013-06-20T08:51:41Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12414">
<title>E-government in Australia</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12414</link>
<description>E-government in Australia
Burgess Susan; Houghton Janice
Hernon, P; Cullen, R; Relyea, H C

</description>
<dc:date>2006-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/11638">
<title>Information-Based Argumentation</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/11638</link>
<description>Information-Based Argumentation
Sierra Carles; Debenham John
R. Goebel, J. Siekmann, andW.Wahlster
Information-based argumentation aims to model the partnerâ¿¿s reasoning apparatus to the extent that an agent can work with it to achieve outcomes that are mutually satisfactory and lay the foundation for continued interaction and perhaps lasting business relationships. Information-based agents take observations at face value, qualify them with a belief probability and build models solely on the basis of messages received. Using augmentative dialogue that describes what is good or bad about proposals, these agents observe such statements and aim to model the way their partners react, and then to generate dialogue that works in harmony with their partnerâ¿¿s reasoning.
</description>
<dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/11626">
<title>Requirements elicitation: A survey of techniques, approaches and Tools</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/11626</link>
<description>Requirements elicitation: A survey of techniques, approaches and Tools
Zowghi Didar; Coulin Chad
Aurum, A; Wohlin, C;

</description>
<dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/7869">
<title>A Novel Strategy For Multiagent Coalitions in a Dynamic Hostile World</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/7869</link>
<description>A Novel Strategy For Multiagent Coalitions in a Dynamic Hostile World
Goyal Madhu
Subhas Mukhopadhyay and Gourab Sen Gupta
One of the main underpinning of the multi-agent systems community is how and why autonomous agents should cooperate with one another. Several formal and computational models of cooperative work or coalition are currently developed and used within multi-agent systems research. The coalition facilitates the achievement of cooperation among different agents. In this paper, a mental construct called attitude is proposed and its significance in coalition formation in a dynamic fire world is discussed. It shows that coalitions explore the attitudes and behaviours that help agents to achieve goals that cannot be achieved alone or to maximize net group utility.
</description>
<dc:date>2007-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
