<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>General</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/245" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/245</id>
<updated>2013-05-23T07:46:52Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-05-23T07:46:52Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Congruent Facilitation of Simulations and Games</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12756" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Spindler Laraine</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Leigh Elyssebeth</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12756</id>
<updated>2012-05-07T03:49:21Z</updated>
<published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Congruent Facilitation of Simulations and Games
Spindler Laraine; Leigh Elyssebeth
R Shiratori, K Arai and F Kato (eds)

</summary>
<dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Work and learning: some challenges for practice</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12458" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Boud David</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12458</id>
<updated>2013-03-25T01:16:44Z</updated>
<published>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Work and learning: some challenges for practice
Boud David
Poikela, E

</summary>
<dc:date>2005-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Learning and teaching science with analogies and metaphors</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12456" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Aubusson Peter</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Treagust David</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Harrison Allan</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/12456</id>
<updated>2013-02-08T05:06:03Z</updated>
<published>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Learning and teaching science with analogies and metaphors
Aubusson Peter; Treagust David; Harrison Allan
Ritchie, S.
[n this chapter, we review Australasian research to outline the broad pathways this research has followed and to highlight s ignificant contributions the work has made to science education. We describe a series of studies from different research groups and highlight two seminal publications that are discussed later in finer detail. The first publication Metaphor and analogy in science education (Aubusson, Harrison &amp; Ritchie, 2006a) provides a state of the art analysis of how metaphors and analogies are used in science classrooms; the majority of the authors are Australasian. The second publication Using analogies in middle and secondOlY science classrooms (Harrison &amp; Coli, 2008) provides both a scholarly argument for using analogies in science teaching and also presents 50 concepts from biology, chemistry, physics and earth and space science that have been taught using a model for effective analogy teaching. The chapter concludes with an analysis identifying where gaps remain in our understanding of the role of analogy and metaphor in science education and suggests emerging fields for further study.
</summary>
<dc:date>2009-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Corporatizing knowledge: work-based learning at the University of Technology, Sydney</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10453/11698" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Solomon Nicole</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gustavs Julie</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10453/11698</id>
<updated>2013-02-06T02:40:40Z</updated>
<published>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Corporatizing knowledge: work-based learning at the University of Technology, Sydney
Solomon Nicole; Gustavs Julie
Michelson, E; Mandell, A

</summary>
<dc:date>2004-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
