The Social Construction of the Microfinance Industry: a comparison of donor and recipient perspectives

Arjun Bisen
Bronwen Dalton
Rachel Wilson


Microfinance has been one of the fastest growing “industries” of the new millennium, with the sector now containing over 10,000 microfinance institutions (MFIs) worth an estimated USD with over $60 billion in assets (Microfinance Information Exchange 2011). This expansion has stimulated interest from both scholars and the mainstream media. There is a growing volume of academic research which broadly centres on two approaches: an “institutionalist perspective” that highlights microfinance as an innovation in applying market solutions to social problems; and the other approach, often described as welfarist, that questions the capacity of an increasingly commericalised sector to realize a mission of poverty reduction. But do these themes and concerns permeate academic boundaries? Specifically, does media coverage in key donor and recipient countries confirm or challenge or even engage with these debates? To date much of this academic literature has overlooked how “microfinance” has been socially constructed in the public sphere through the mass media. Through its interpretation of events, the media can influence the way an issue is discussed and evaluated and in this way influence individual perceptions (Gamson 1988). In this article we present an analysis of recent media coverage of microfinance in one key donor country, the United States and one major recipient country, India. By conducting a media content analysis of 100 newspaper articles (sorted by level of relevance) that appeared in the top 10 highest circulating English language newspapers in India and the US over a 12 month period January-December 2008 we discuss how media coverage in these two countries differed in significant ways. The Indian media sample tended to focus on operational issues and report on specific business activity within the microfinance industry, in general treating it as a ‘regular’ part of the financial and banking system. While the US media sample made broader generalizations about the industry, linking it to meta narratives and broader themes – peculiarly microfinance as an innovation due to its harnessing of market forces to realize positive social outcomes. This finding contributes to understanding of the interpretations, and the differences in interpretations, of microfinance between donor and recipient countries and offers insights into the power relations at play within the microfinance industry and the broader development and business community.


Microfinance; Nonprofit; India, US

Full Text:



Ahlin, C. & Lin, J. 2006, Luck or Skill? MFI Performance in Macroeconomic Context, BREAD Working Paper no. 132.

Annamalai, E. 2004, 'Medium of power: The question of English in education in India', in J.W. Tollefson & A.B.M. Tsui (eds.), Medium of instruction policies: Which agenda? Whose agenda? Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp. 177-194.

Ayayi, A. G. & Sene, M. 2008, 'What Drives Microfinance Institution Financial Sustainability', Microfinance Chair of Groupe Banque Populaire working paper.

Babbie, E. 2003, 'Lessons learned from teaching qualitative methods', Qualitative Research Journal, Special Issue 2003, pp.12-23

Bateman, M. and Chang, H.J. 2009, 'The Microfinance Illusion',

Bellman, E. & Chang, A. 2010, 'Backlash in microlending', Wall Street Journal October 22.

Bennett, D. 2009, 'Small change: billions of dollars and a Nobel prize later, it looks like 'microlending' doesn't actually do much to fight poverty', The Boston Globe, 20 September.

Brau, J. & Woller, G.M. 2004, 'Microfinance: a comprehensive review of the existing literature', Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures, no. 9, pp. 1 - 26.

Bruck, C. 2006, 'Millions for millions', The New Yorker, October issue

Campaign, M. S. 2007, 'State of the Microcredit Summit Campaign Report 2007'.

Census of India 2003, Issue 10: pp 8-10,

CGAP 2003, 'The new vision of microfinance: Financial services for the poor, The History of Microfinance', Prepared for CGAP UNCDF Donor Training.

CGAP 2007, CGAP Brief, Washington DC.

Christen, R. P. 2001, 'Commercialization and Mission Drift', Occasional Paper, CGAP, Washington.

Copestake, J. 2007, 'Mainstreaming microfinance: social performance management or mission drift? World Development, vol.35, no. 10, pp. 1721-1738."

Deutsche Bank Research 2007, Microfinance: an emerging investment opportunity, Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt am Main.

The Economist 2011, 'Bulletins from the future, July 7

ENP Newswire 2008, Princess Maxima of the Netherlands and IDB President Inaugurate Seminar on Microfinance and Inclusion, 23 April 2008.

Fernando, N. A. 2004, 'Microfinance outreach to the poorest: A realistic objective?', Asian Development Bank: A Quarterly Newsletter of The Focal Point For Microfinance, vol.5, no.1.

Gamson, W. 1988, 'Political discourse and collective action' in B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi and S. Tarrow (eds), From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures, JAI Press, pp. 219-246.

Gonzalez, A. 2007, Resilience of Microfinance Institutions to National Macroeconomic Events: An Econometric Analysis of MFI Asset Quality, MIX Discussion Paper no. 1.

Hollis, A. & Sweetman, A. 1998a, 'Microcredit in prefamine Ireland. Explorations in Economic History vol.35, pp. 347-380"

Hollis, A. & Sweetman, A. 1998b, 'Microcredit: What Can we Learn from the Past?' World Development, vol. 26, no.10, pp. 1875-1891.

Hulme, D. & Mosley, P. 1996, 'Microenterprise finance: Is there a conflict between growth and poverty alleviation?' World Development, vol. 26 no. 5, pp. 783-790.

Krauss, N., Walter, I., 2009, 'Can Microfinance Reduce Portfolio Volatility?' Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 58, no.1, pp.85110.

Kumar, J. 2003, Newspaper Marketing in India: A Focus on Language Press, Anmol Publications.

Lewis, J. C. 2008, 'Microloan Sharks', Stanford Social Innovation Review vol. 6, no.3, pp.55-59.

Lyotard, J.-F. 1984, The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

MacFarquhar, N. 2010, 'Banks making big profits from tiny loans', The New York Times. April 13, 2010.

Metcalf, T. 2006, A Concise History of Modern India, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Morduch, J. 1999, 'The microfinance promise', Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XXXVII December, pp.1569-1614.

Morduch, J. 1998, 'The microfinance schism', World Development, vol.28, no.4, pp. 617-629.

Morduch, J. 2007, 'Online Extra Microlending: It's no cure-all', Businessweek Online, December 13th.

Newsmaker 2008, 'The big problem in Indian journalism is the lack of quality and experience at the copy desk',

Otero, M. 1999, 'Bringing development back, into microfinance', Journal of Microfinance, vol.1, no.1.

Phillips, L. 1996, 'Rhetoric and the spread of the discourse of Thatcherism', Discourse & Society, vol.7, no.2, pp. 209-241.

Parameswaran, R. 2004, 'Global queens, national celebrities: tales of feminine triumph in post-liberalization India', Critical Studies in Media Communication, vol. 21, no. 4, pp.346 - 37.

Peer, B. 2007, ' Style Over Substance: Despite India's media boom, its journalism is shrinking', Columbian Journalism Review, May / June

Ramanathan, V. 2005, The English-vernacular divide: Postcolonial language politics and practice, Clevedon, Multilingual Matters.

Rhyne, E. 2001, 'Commercialisation and crisis in Bolivian Microfinance', Development Alternatives, Inc., Bethesda, MA.

Riffe, D., S. Lacy & F. Fico 2008, Analyzing Media Messages, Routledge.

Schreiner, M. 2003, 'A cost-effectiveness analysis of the Grameen Bank of Bangladesh', Development Policy Review, vol.21, no.3, pp. 357-382.

Scrase, T. 2004, 'The hegemony of English in India', in: R. Cribb (ed.), Asia examined: Proceedings of the 15th Biennial Conference of the ASAA, 2004, Canberra, Asian Studies Association of Australia & Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University.

Scully, N. 2004, Microcredit: No panacea for poor women, Global Development Research Centre, Washington, DC.

Simanowitz, S. 2002, 'Microfinance for the poorest: A review of issues and ideas for contribution of Imp-Act', Improving the impact of microfinance on Poverty: An Action Research Programme, University of Sussex, Brighton.

Sinclair, Hugh 2012, Confessions of a microfinance heretic: how micro-lending lost its way and betrayed the poor, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Siroya, Shivani 2010, 'The backlash in microfinance', The Huffington Post November 10,

Woller, G. M. 2002, 'The promise and peril of microfinance commercialization', Small Enterprise Development, vol.13, no.4, pp.1221.

Woller, G. M., Dunford, C., & Woodworth, W. 1999, 'Where to microfinance?'. International Journal of Economic Development, vol.1, no.1, pp. 2964.

Yunus, M. 2005, 'Social Business Entrepreneurs Are the Solution', Grameen Foundation USA Publication Series.

Yunus, M. 2001, 'Towards creating a poverty-free world', in Hossain, F. and Rahman, Z. (Eds.), Microfinance and Poverty: Contemporary Perspectives, Department of Administrative Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, pp. 21 -41.

Yunus, M. & Jolis, A. 2003, Banker to the poor: Micro-lending and the battle against world, Public Affairs (Perseus), New York.

Zeller, M. & Meyer, R.L. 2002, 'The triangle of microfinance: Financial sustainability, outreach and impact', John Hopkins for the International Food Policy Research Institute.