Reconciling Universality and Particularity through a Cosmopolitan Outlook on Human Rights

Rebecca Adami


Abstract

Human rights are today criticized as not compatible with different cultural values and the debate has circulated around Asian values and Islamic values as in dichotomy with human rights as universal ethics (Ignatieff, 2003). The theoretical dichotomy between universality and particularity is questioned pragmatically in this paper through a historical study. The working process of drafting the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in 1946-48, which included thousands of people, is explored as a cosmopolitan space in which individuals from different cultural contexts met to negotiate human rights through cultural narratives. The process where particular values were negotiated with universal notion on human rights resulted in a common proclamation (UDHR) without a common philosophical or ideological ground. This paper puts forth a thesis that human rights discourse can work as a cosmopolitan space, in which particular value systems meet in processes characterized by conflict and cohesion. Hence human rights can be understood as a master narrative compatible with different conflicting cultural narratives (Gibson & Somers, 1994).

Keywords

Universality, cosmopolitanism, human rights, interrelational learning

Full Text

PDF

References

Andreopoulos, C. 1997, Human Rights Education for the Twenty-First Century, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadephia.

Benhabib, S. 2008, Another Cosmopolitanism, Oxford University Press, New York.

Borges, M. 2010, 'From national to cosmopolitan: the blueprint of space in citizenship debates', SGIR 7th Pan-European Conference 2010, Stockholm, Sweden, pp.1-24.

Charvet, J. 1998, 'The possibility of a cosmopolitan ethical order based on the idea of universal human rights', Millennium – Journal of International Studies vol. 27 no.3, pp.523-541.

Gibson, G & Somers, M. 1994, 'Reclaiming the epistemological other": narrative and the social constitution of identity', in Social Theory and the Politics of Identity, ed. Calhoun, C. Oxford, Blackwell Press, pp.37-99."

Glendon, M. 2001, A World Made New, Random House, New York.

Griffin, J. 2008, On Human Rights, Rainolds Room, Oxford. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238781.001.0001

Horsdal, M. 2011, Telling Lives; Exploring Dimensions of Narratives, Routledge, London.

Ignatieff, M. 2003, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

Kleingeld, P., & Brown, E. 2006, Cosmopolitanism. Retrieved October 2011 from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmopolitanism/

Langlois, A. 2001, The Politics of Justice and Human Rights – South East Asia and Universalist Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Lauren, P. 2003, The Evolution of International Human Rights, Second Edition, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

Li, X. 2006, Ethics, Human Rights and Culture – Universalism and Cultural Relativism in Ethics, Palgrave, Gordonsville.

Morsink, J. 1999, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights –Origins, Drafting and Intent, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

Nussbaum, M. 2003, Cultivating Humanity, a Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Rizvi, F. 2008, 'Epistemic virtues and cosmopolitan learning', The Australian Educational Researcher, vol. 35, no. 1 pp.17-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03216873

Taylor, S. 1997, 'Critical Policy Analysis: exploring contexts, texts and consequences', Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, vol.18, no.1, pp.23-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0159630970180102

Taylor, C. 1999, 'Conditions of an unforced consensus on human rights', in Bauer, J. & Bell, D. (eds), The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, p.126

Tesón, F. 1985, 'International Human rights and Cultural Relativism', Virginia Journal of International Law, vol.25, no.4, pp.869-98.

UNESCO, 1947, Comite sur les principles philosophiques des droits de l'homme, part I.

UNESCO, 1948, Human Rights, Comments and Interpretations, 25 July.