Accountability Requirements and Professional Development in the US Adult Basic and Literacy Education System

CRISTINE SMITH

Abstract


Even before the 2001 enactment of the No Child Left Behind legislation, the education bill that holds schools in the US accountable for student achievement, ‘adult education [had] become part and parcel of the new federal trend to encourage the setting of national education goals and standards and holding programs accountable for demonstrating achievements’ (Sticht 1998). Now, almost ten years after enacting the Workforce Investment Act (1998), the legislation that required states to report how adult students were making progress towards educational and work goals, the field is just beginning to take stock of whether accountability has helped or hurt our adult education system.
In the US school system (kindergarten to 12th grade for children five to 18), several researchers have investigated the effect of stronger accountability requirements on professional development systems. Berry et al. (2003), in a study of 250 teachers and principals in schools across six Southeastern US states found that results were mixed:
Although high-stakes accountability systems help focus professional development efforts on the curricular needs of students, little evidence exists to support the claim that such systems help teachers change their practice to enhance student learning...A tendency exists…to narrow the focus of professional development activities to tested subjects or provide general support that is disconnected from curricular needs. (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 2004:3)

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Institutes for Research (AIR) (2005) A Brief History of the National Reporting System. Washington, DC American Institute for Research, powerpoint presentation, retrieved 14 Dec 2007 from http://www.nrsweb.org/about/history.aspx.

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) (2004) Teacher Professional Development in High-Stakes Accountability Systems.Research Brief vol 2, no 13, pp 1-4, retrieved 3 Nov 2007 from http://www.ascd.org/.

Belzer, A (2003) Living with it: Federal policy implementation in Adult Basic Education, The cases of the Workforce Investment Act and Welfare Reform, NCSALL Reports #24, National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, Boston, MA.

Belzer, A, Drennon, C, and Smith, C (2001) Building professional development systems in adult basic education: Lessons from the field, in Comings, J, Garner, B & Smith, C, eds, The Annual Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, vol 2, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 151â188.

Berry, B, Turchi, L, Johnson, D, Hare, D, Owens, DD, and Clements, S (2003) The Impact of High Stakes Accountability on Teachers' Professional Development: Evidence from the South: A Final Report to the Spencer Foundation, Southeast Center for Teaching Quality, Inc., Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Bingman, MB (2000) Outcomes of participation in Adult Basic Education:The importance of learners' perspectives.NCSALL Occasional Paper, National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, Boston, MA.

Burt, M and Keenan, F (1998) Trends in Staff Development for Adult ESL Instructors, ESL Resources Digests, National Center for ESL Literacy Education, Washington, D.C.

National Adult Education Professional Development Consortium (NAEPDC) (2008) Professional Development On-line Resource Library, retrieved 3 Feb 2008 from http://naepdc.org/resource_library/professional_development/PD_home.html.

RMC Research Corporation (1996) National evaluation of the Section 353 set-aside for teacher training and innovation in adult education, summary report, RMC Research Corporation, Portsmouth, NH.

Smith, C, Hofer, J, Solomon, M, Gillespie, M and Rowe, K (2003) How Teachers Change: A Study of Professional Development in Adult Basic Education, NCSALL Reports #25, National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, Boston, MA.

Smith, C and Hofer, J (2003) The Characteristics and Concerns of Adult Basic Education Teachers, NCSALL Reports No. 26, National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, Boston, MA.

Smith, MC (2006) The preparation and stability of the ABE teaching workforce: Current conditions and future prospects.Chapter 6 in J. Comings, J, Garner, B, & Smith, C, eds, Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, vol. 6.Lawrence Erlbaum, Inc, Mahwah, New Jersey.

Sticht, T (1998) Beyond 2000:Future Directions for Adult Education, OVAE, Washington, DC. available at http://www.nald.ca/library/research/beyond/Beyond.PDF

Tolbert, M (2001) Professional development for adult education instructors: State policy update, National Institute for Literacy, Washington DC.

Wilson, B, and Corbett, D (2001) Adult basic education and professional development: Strangers for too long. Focus on Basics, vol 4, no D, pp 25â26.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/lns.v17i3.1395