Scaling Up and Moving In: Connecting social practices views to policies and programs in adult education

Stephen Reder


Abstract

The social practices framework has had a major impact on adult literacy and numeracy research over the past quarter century in the US, the UK and other countries. To date, the social practices view has had far less influence on the development of policies and programs in adult literacy and numeracy education. To help this happen, new kinds of assessment tools aligned with the social practices framework are needed to support appropriate changes in curriculum design, learner assessment and program evaluation.
In this article research is presented that illustrates how measures of adults’ engagement in literacy and numeracy practices can be used in conjunction with well-entrenched proficiency measures to provide a richer quantitative framework for adult literacy and numeracy development. Longitudinal data about learners indicate that adult education programs are more closely aligned with practice engagement measures than with proficiency measures. Program participation leads to increased practice engagement that, over time, leads to the very gains in proficiency currently valued by policy makers.

Full Text

PDF

References

Beder, H (1999) The Outcomes and Impacts of Adult Literacy Education in the United States, National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy, Cambridge, MA.

Brandt, D and Clinton, K (2002) Limits of the Local: Expanding perspectives on literacy as a social practice, Journal of Literacy Research, vol 34, no 3, pp 337-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3403_4

Erickan, K and Roth, W (2006) What Good is Polarizing Research into Qualitative and Quantitative?, Educational Researcher, vol 35, no 5, pp 14-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035005014

Hamilton, M (2001) Privileged Literacies: Policy, institutional process and the life of the IALS, Language and Education, vol 15, no 2-3, pp 178-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500780108666809

Hamilton, M and Barton, D (2000) The International Adult Literacy Survey: What does it really measure?, International Journal of Education, vol 46, no 5, pp 377-389.

Hu, L and Bentler, P (1999) Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling, vol 6, pp 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Humphreys, L (1960) Investigations of the Simplex, Psychometrika, vol 25, pp 313-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289750

Joreskog, K (1979) Statistical Models and Methods for Analysis of Longitudinal Data, in Joreskog, K and Sorbom, D, eds, Advances in Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Models, Abt Books, Cambridge, MA, pp 129-169.

Luke, A and Hogan, D (2006) Steering Educational Research in National Contexts: The Singapore model, in Coulby, D, Ozga, J, Popkewitz, T, and Seddon, T, eds, World Yearbook of Education: Educational research and policy, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

Muthén, L and Muthén, B (2007) Mplus User's Guide, fifth edition, Muthén and Muthén, Los Angeles.

Purcell-Gates, V, Jacobson, E and Degener, S (2004) Print Literacy: Uniting cognitive and social practice theories, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

Reder, S (1994) Practice Engagement Theory: A Sociocultural approach to literacy across languages and cultures, in Ferdman, B, Weber, M and Ramirez, A, Eds, Literacy across Languages and Cultures, SUNY-Albany Press, Albany, pp 33-74.

Reder, S (2007) Giving Literacy Away, Again: New concepts of promising practice, in Belzer, A, ed, Towards Defining and Improving Quality in Adult Basic Education: Issues and challenges, Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ, pp 255-276.

Reder, S (2008) The Development of Literacy and Numeracy in Adult Life, in Reder, S and Bynner, J, eds, Tracking Adult Literacy and Numeracy Skills: Findings from longitudinal research, Routledge, New York and London, pp 59-84.

Reder, S (forthcoming) Connecting Literacy Growth and Economic Development, National Institute for Literacy, Washington DC.

Reder, S and Strawn, C (2001a) The K-12 School Experiences of High School Dropouts, Focus on Basics, vol 4(D), pp 12-13.

Reder, S and Strawn, C (2001b) Program Participation and Self-Directed Learning to Improve Basic Skills, Focus on Basics, vol 4(D), pp 14-17.

Reder, S and Davila, E (2005) Context and Literacy Practices, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, vol 25, pp 170-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000097

Reder, S and Strawn, C (2006) Broadening the Concepts of Participation and Program Support, Focus on Basics, vol 8(C), pp 6-10.

Reder, S and Bynner, J (2008) Introduction: The need for longitudinal studies in adult literacy and numeracy education, in Reder, S and Bynner, J, eds, Tracking Adult Literacy and Numeracy Skills: Findings from longitudinal research, Routledge, New York and London, pp 1-24.

Satorra, A and Bentler, P (1999) A Scaled Difference Chi-squared Test Statistic for Moment Structure Analysis, retrieved 20 June 2008 from http://preprints.stat.ucla.edu/260/chisquare.pdf

Sheehan-Holt, J and Smith, C (2000) Does Basic Skills Education Affect Adults' Literacy Proficiencies and Reading Practices?, Reading Research Quarterly, vol 35, no 2, pp 226-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.35.2.2

Street, B (1997) Literacy, Economy and Society: A review, Working Papers on Literacy, The Centre for Literacy, Montreal.