Government Support and Infrastructure: Realizing the value of collaborative work

Peter Levesque


CCommunity-campus research has undergone significant growth over the last two decades. While there has been some support in the form of government programs, significant gaps remain. The identification of collaborative research – what Gibbons et al. (1994) called Mode Two, complementing more traditional Mode One research – necessitates a better understanding of the incentives and infrastructure needed to produce greater value from both modes of research production. This article presents an argument that research is fundamentally three questions: what, so what and now what. It further argues that while the system is good at producing data and information as well as interpretation and analysis, it is not quite so competent when it comes to decisions that produce value beyond products, programs and sometimes, policies. This article introduces concepts related to knowledge mobilization and the need for dedicated incentives and infrastructure to realize the value of collaborative work. It introduces a taxonomy of legal government powers to protect and promote public health that may be adapted to the creation of support for community-campus research. This article suggests that government support for collaborative research must be built from arguments that demonstrate the added value that comes from engaging in these processes. It further argues that this is essentially a political process that must include explicit and open conversations across sectors and stakeholders.

Full Text:



European Commission 2007, 'Ile-de-France Bringing science closer tosociety' (online), available: tm, viewed 15 May 2007.

Evans RG 1999, 'Purchasing population health: Paying for results', Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 12381244.

Gibbons, M, Limoges, C, Nowotny, H, Schwartzman, S, Scott, P & Trow, M1994, The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, Sage, London.

Gostin, LO 2004, 'Health of the people: The highest law?', The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 509515.

Gostin, LO 2005, 'The core values of public health law and ethics' in TMBailey, T Caulfield & NM Ries (eds), Public health law and policy in Canada, LexisNexis Canada, Markham, p. xi.

Henrie M & Hedgepeth, O 2003, 'Size is important in knowledgemanagement', Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, August.

Kawachi, I 1999, 'Social capital and community effects on population andindividual health, Annals of the New York Academy of Science, vol. 896, pp. 120130.

Lasker RD & Weiss, ES 2003, 'Broadening participation in communityproblem-solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborativepractice and research', Journal of Urban Health, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 1447.

Lavis, JN, Robertson, D, Woodside, JM, McLeod CB & Abelson, J 2003, 'How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge todecision makers', The Millbank Quarterley, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 221248.

Manion, I 2004, 'Best practices -building on the strengths: Children andyouth with special needs', paper presented at the Ontario Children andYouth Summit, Toronto, 25 November 2004.

Marmot, M 2005, 'Social determinants of health inequalities', The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9464, pp. 10991104.

Morrison, C 2002, Health, education and poverty reduction, OECD Development Center, Paris.

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 2006, 'About SSHRC' (online), available:, viewed 16 April 2007.

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada 2007, 'Applyingfor funding: Community-University research alliances' (online), available:, viewed 16 April 2007.

Thompson, GN, Estabrooks CA & Degner, LF 2006, 'Clarifying the conceptsin knowledge transfer: A literature review', Journal of Advanced Nursing, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 691701.

Wheatley, M 2006, Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco.