Notes on a Genre to Come: Screenwriting and the 'Thesis-film'

Steven Maras

Abstract


This piece draws together two areas: screenwriting and film or video works (to be jointly referred to as ‘films’) that explicitly try to undertake a conceptual practice. Conceptual practice is to be understood here not within the exclusive framework of conceptual or abstract art, but of acts and interventions in theory of the kind that crossover between the academy and the broader culture. Interventions of this kind have (especially in the form of the essay film, and films by humanities academics) been a part of Australian screen culture since at least the 1980s. While these interventions may not appear to be central to much cultural studies work, I want to suggest that cultural studies is intertwined with them in at least three ways.

Keywords


Screenwriting; film; conceptual practice; thesis-film; Australia; screen culture; humanities;

Full Text:

PDF

References


ARONSON, L. 2000. Scriptwriting Updated: New and Conventional Ways of Writing for the Screen, North Ryde, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards/ Australian Film Television and Radio School.

ASTRUC, A. 1968. The Birth of a New Avant-Garde: La Caméra Stylo. In: GRAHAM, P. (ed.) The New Wave. London: Secker and Warburg/BFI.

BAZIN, A. 1971. What is Cinema, Vol. 2, Berkeley, Trans. H. Gray, University of California Press.

BORDWELL, D. & THOMPSON, K. 1986. Film Art: An Introduction, New York, Alfred A. Knopf.

BRECHT, B. 1978. Brecht on Theatre, New York, Trans. J. Willett, Hill and Wang.

CLOVER, C. J. 1992. Men, Women and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film, Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.

DANEY, S. 2000. Theorize/Terrorize (Godardian Pedagogy). In: WILSON, D. (ed.) Cahiers du Cinéma, Volume Four 1973–1978: History, Ideology, Cultural Struggle. London: Routledge.

EISENSTEIN, S. 1988. The Montage of Film Attractions. In: TAYLOR, R. (ed.) Eisenstein: Writings 1922–1923. London/Bloomington: BFI/Indiana.

GAUDREAULT, A. 2000. Film, Narrative, Narration: The Cinema of the Lumière Brothers. In: ELSAESSER, T. (ed.) Early Cinema: Space, Frame, Narrative. London: BFI.

KING, N. 1993. That was Then, This is Now”: An Interview with Colin MacCabe, British Film Institute, 3 September 1992. Southern Review, 26, 159.

KING, N. 1993. What was Then, This is Now: Writing and Teaching in the 1990s. Continuum: The Australian Journal of Media and Culture, 7, 232-36.

KING, N. 1994. My Life Without Steve: Postmodernism, Ficto-Criticism, and the Paraliterary. Southern Review, 27, 261-75.

KOLB, D. 1994. Socrates in the Labyrinth. In: LANDOW, G. (ed.) Hyper/Text/Theory. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.

LEAHY, G. & KING, N. 1994. I’d Thought for a Long Time that I’d Make an Experimental Film about Romantic Love: An Interview with Gillian Leahy about My Life Without Steve. Continuum : The Australian Journal of Media & Culture, 7, 238-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304319409365613

MARTIN, A. 1997. Making a Bad Script Worse: The Curse of the Scriptwriting Manual. Australian Book Review [Online]. Available: http://home.vicnet.net.au/~abr/April99/mar/htm.

RE, J.-P. S. 1989. No Exit and Three Other Plays, New York, Vintage.

RUIZ, R. 1995. Poetics of Cinema, Paris, Dis Voir.

THOMPSON, K. 1999. Storytelling in the New Hollywood: Understanding Classical Narrative Technique, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.

THOMPSON, P. 1998. The Cinematic Essay. Available: http://www.chicagomediaworks.com/2instructworks/3editing_doc/docessay.doc.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/csr.v10i2.3473