Communities in control? The challenges of neighbourhood governance with reference to local government reform in England

Harriet Churchill


Abstract

Recent local government and public service reforms in England have been orientated towards devolving public service delivery and decision-making to the neighbourhood level. These reforms have been driven by political, social and managerial agendas that aim to make local government more accountable and responsive to local communities, to build social capital and to enhance the cost-effectiveness of local services. This paper, with reference to the current policy framework in England, aims to identify and review the possibilities and challenges for local government officials and partner agencies in moving towards decentralised public service provision and governance. The paper initially identifies the key aspects of reform brought in by the central government Department of Communities and Local Government that seek to extend neighbourhood influence and governance structures. The discussion then turns towards considering the challenges in ensuring effective citizen participation – namely responding to multiple policy objectives; devising appropriate neighbourhood governance structures; re-thinking the role of local government; identifying and managing trade-offs; building community and local government capabilities for wide-ranging participation; and ensuring effective partnership working at all levels of local government. In conclusion the important steps towards tackling these challenges in England are recognised although a number of concerns remain.

Full Text

PDF

References

Almedom, A (2005) 'Social Capital and Mental Health: An Interdisciplinary Review of Primary Evidence', Social Science and Medicine, 61, 5, pp.943-964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.025

Beattie, R.S., Osborne, S and Williamson, P.A (2004) 'Addressing fragmentation and social exclusion through community involvement in rural regeneration partnerships: evidence from the Northern Ireland experience', Policy and Politics, 32, 3, pp.351-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/0305573041223708

Bingham, L.B., Nabatchi, T, O'Leary, R (2005) The New Governance: practices and processes of stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of the government, Public Administration Review, 65, 5, pp.547-558.

Birchall, R.J and Simmons, R.A. (2002) A Theoretical Model of What Motivates Public Services Users to Participate, London: ESRC.

Blair, T (1998) Leading the way: A new vision for local government, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

Blears, H (2008) Five years from now, Speech to the LGC Community Engagement Conference, 19th March 2008, London: Royal Horticultural Halls.

Bovaird, T and Lofler, E (eds) (2003) Public Management and Governance, London: Routledge.

Burns, D (2000) 'Practices for Citizenship', Community, Work and Family, 3, 3, pp.261-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13668800020006794

Clare, L and Cox, S (2003) 'Improving service approaches and outcomes for people with complex needs through consultation and involvement', Disability and Society, 18, 7, pp.935-953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0968759032000127344

Corry, D., Hatter, W., Parker, I., Randle, A and Stoker, G (2004) Joining Up Local Democracy: Governance systems for New Localism, London: NGLN.

Curtis, K., Liabo, K., Roberts, H and Barker, M (2004) 'Consulted but not heard', Health Expectations, 7, 2, pp.149-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00265.x

Daly, G and Davies, H (2002) 'Partnerships for local governance: citizens, communities and accountability', in Glendinning, C., Powell, M and Rummery, K (eds) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, Policy Press, Bristol.

Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2006) Strong and prosperous communities, Local Government White Paper, London: HMSO.

DCLG (2008) Unlocking the talent of our communities, Leeds: Communities and Local Government Publications.

Department of Education and Skills (DfES) (2004) Ten Year Childcare Strategy, London: HMSO.

Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) (2006) Empowering People To Work, London: HMSO.

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1998) Modern local government: In touch with the people, Cm 4014, London: TSO.

Diamond, J (2004) 'Local Regeneration Initiatives and Capacity Building: Whose 'Capacity' and 'Building' for What?', Community Development Journal, 2004, 39, 2, pp.177-189.

Evans, M., Eyre, J., Millar, J and Sarre, S (2003) New Deal for Lone Parents: Second Synthesis Report for the National Evaluation, London: HMSO.

Fawcett, B and South, J (2005) 'Community Involvement and Primary Care Trusts: The Case for Social Entrepreneurship', Critical Public Health, 2005, 15, 2, pp.191-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09581590500144660

Ghate, D and Hazel, N (2002), Parenting in Poor Environments: Stress, Support and Coping, London: Jessica Kingsley.

Glendinning, C., Powell, M and Rummery, K (eds) (2002) Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare, Policy Press, Bristol.

Hilder, P. (2005) Seeing the wood for trees: the evolving landscape for neighbourhood arrangements, London: Young Foundation.

Home Office (2003) Home Office Citizenship Survey, London: Stationary Office.

HM Treasury (2007) Meeting the aspirations of the British people: 2007 Pre-Budget Report and Comprehensive Spending Review, Cm 7227, London: HMSO.

Ipsos/ MORI (2007) Public services policy review: The public view, Final report of the Citizens Panels, available at www.mori.com.

Kelly, R (2006) Reform to bring 'devolution to the doorstep', Press release for the Department for Communities and Local Government, 2006/0100, 19th September 2006, accessed at <>

MORI/ Audit Commission (2003) Trust in Public Institutions, London: MORI. Myers, P., Barnes, J and Brodie, I (2004) Partnership working in Sure Start Local Programmes, NESS Synthesis Report 1, London: DfES.

Neighbourhood Renewal Unit (2002) Collaboration and Coordination in Area Based Initiatives, London: NRU.

Lowndes, V and Sullivan, H (2006) How Low Can You Go? Neighbourhood Governance and Modernisation, paper for the Political Studies Annual Conference, Reading, April 2006.

Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L and Stoker, G (2002) The Locality Effect: Local Government and Citizen Participation, working paper, De Montfort University, Department of Public Policy.

Lupton, R (2004) Poverty Street, Bristol: Polity Press.

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005) New Localism – Citizen Engagement, Neighbourhoods and Public Services: Evidence from Local Government, London: ODPM.

ODPM and Home Office (2005) Citizen Engagement and Public Services: Why Neighbourhoods Matter London: ODPM

OECD (2001) Citizens as Partners: Handbook on information, consultation and public participation, Paris: OECD.

Pearce, G and Mawson, J (2003) 'Delivering Devolved Approaches to Local Governance', Policy and Politics, 2003, 31, 1, pp. 51-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557303321095590

Perri 6., Leat, D., Skelzer, K and Stoker, G (2002) Towards Holistic Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Pollitt, C and Bouckhaert, G (2004) Public Management Reform, Oxford: OUP.

Pollitt, C and Talbot, C (2004) Unbundled Governance, London: Routledge.

Social Exclusion Unit (2004), Tackling Social Exclusion: Progress so far, London: HMSO.

Skidmore, P., Bound, K and Lownsbrough, H (2006) Community Participation: Who benefits? London: DEMOS/JRF.

Stoker, G (2006) Why Politics Matters, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Williams, C (2005) 'Cultivating Community Self-Help in Deprived Urban Neighborhoods', City & Community, 2005, 4, 2, pp.171-188.

Williams, F and Churchill, H (2006) Empowering parents in Sure Start Local Programmes, National Evaluation of Sure Start Report, NESS/2006/FR/018, London: DfES.