Reconceptualising Shared Services

Peter McKinlay

Abstract


Endeavours to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of local government have been a persistent theme both of politicians in higher tiers of government and of interest groups, especially business. The two contenders for improvement which receive most coverage both in the research literature and in popular discussion are amalgamation and shared services. Arguments from the literature have generally favoured shared services over amalgamation. Bish (2001) in a comprehensive review of North American research dismisses the argument for amalgamation as a product of flawed nineteenth-century thinking and a bureaucratic urge for centralized control. He does so making the very reasonable point that the presumed economies of scale which will result from amalgamation are a function not of the size and scale of individual local authorities, but of the services for which those local authorities are responsible, and the point at which economies of scale will be optimised will be very different for different services. The case against amalgamation is also reinforced by the absence of any significant post-facto evidence that amalgamation achieves either the promised savings or the anticipated efficiency gains (McKinlay 2006).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Australian Centre of Excellence for Local Government (2011). Consolidation in Local Government: A Fresh Look, on the web at http://www.acelg.org.au/upload/Consolidation%20Final%20Report%20Vol%201_web.pdf

Bish, R. (2001). Local Government Amalgamations: 19th Century Ideas for the 21st Century. Toronto: Howe Institute.

Browne Jacobson (2011). Shared Services Survey, accessed February 2011

Deloitte, (2010). Stop, Start, Save: Shared Service Delivery in Local Government, on the web at:

Dollery, B. et al (2009) Shared Services in Australian Local Government: Rationale, Alternative Models and Empirical Evidence, The Australian Journal of Public Administration. 68 (2): 208â219.

Gershon, Sir Peter (2004). Releasing resources to the front line: Independent Review of Public Sector Efficiency. London: The Stationery Office.

Local Government Reform Commission (2007). Report of the Local Government Reform Commission. accessed February 2011.

McKinlay, P. (2006). Local Government Structure and Efficiency. accessed February 2011.

Regional District Task Force (2010) Enhancing Tools for Problem Solving in Regions. Union of British Columbia Municipalities. On the web at: http://www.ubcm.ca/assets/Resolutions~and~Policy/Policy/Governance/RDTF%20Final%20Report.pdf#search=%22regional%20district%20task%20force%22

Royal Commission on Auckland Governance, (2009). Auckland Governance Report. http://auckland.royalcommission.govt.nz/rccms.nsf/CONTENTPAGES/$first?open accessed February 2011.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i8/9.2422