Local Government Improvement in England: Policies, Progress and Prospects

Steve Martin


Whilst many countries have been devolving power to the sub-national level England has moved in the opposite direction. For the last decade English local government has been subjected to tight top down performance monitoring and financial controls. The evidence suggests that these policies have helped to encourage significant improvements in performance. However critics argue that they have been costly to implement and have undermined local democratic accountability. In response to these concerns the current government has promised to sweep away external assessment in favour of self-regulation by councils and in-depth scrutiny by citizens. This ‘new localism’ poses important questions for both policy makers and researchers. In particular how far will the promised reforms actually go and what impacts will they have on the service standards?

Full Text:



Andrews, R. (2004). Analysing Deprivation and Local Authority Performance. Public Money and Management. 24(1): 19-26.

Andrews, R., Martin, S.J. (2010). Regional variations in public service outcomes: the impact of policy divergence in England, Scotland and Wales. Regional Studies. 44(8): 919-934.

Audit Commission 2001. Changing Gear: Best Value annual statement 2001. London: Audit Commission.

Audit Commission 2002. Comprehensive Performance Assessment: Scores and analysis of performance for single tier and county councils in England. London: Audit Commission.

Audit Commission 2009. Final score: the impact of the Comprehensive Performance Assessment of local government 2002-08. London: Audit Commission.

Audit Commission 2011. Comprehensive Area Assessment. www.audit-commission.gov.uk/localgov/audit/caa, accessed 15th September 2011.

Ball, A., Broadbent, J., Moore, C. 2002. Best Value and the Control of Local Government. Public Money and Management. 22(2): 9-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00302

Barber, M. 2007. Instruction to Deliver: Tony Blair, the Public Services and the Challenge to Deliver. London: Politicos.

Bevan, G. Hood, C. 2006. What's measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration. 84(3): 517-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x

Blair, T. 1998. A new vision for local government. London: IPPR.

Boyne, G.A. 1998. Competitive tendering in local government services: a review of theory and evidence. Public Administration. 76(4): 695-712. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00132

Boyne, G.A. 2002. Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance. Public Money and Management. 22(2): 17-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00303

Cabinet Office 2011. Big Society â overview. www.cabinetoffice.gov/content/big-society-overview , accessed 15th September 2011.

Choi, Y-C. 1999. The dynamics of public service contracting: the British experience. Bristol: Policy Press.

Cmnd 1998. Modern Local Government: in touch with the people. London: The Stationery Office.

Conservative Party 2009. Control shift: returning power to local communities. Policy Green Paper No. 9, London: Conservative Party.

Copus, C. 2006. British local government: A case for a new constitutional settlement'. Public Policy and Administration. 21(1): 4-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/095207670602100202

Coulson, A. 1998. Trust and contract in public sector management'. In: Coulson, A. (ed.) Trust and contracts: relationships in local government, health and public services. Bristol: Policy Press.

Cutler, T., Waine, B. 2003. Advancing public accountability? The social services 'star' ratings'. Public Money and Management. 23:125â128.

Davies J. 2008. Double devolution or double dealing? The local government white paper and the Lyons review. Local Government Studies 34(1): 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03003930701770397

Davis, H. and Martin, S.J. 2008. Public Services Inspection in the UK. London: Jessica Kingsley.

De Groot, L. 2006. Generating Improvement from Within. In: Martin, S.J. (ed.) Public Service Improvement: policies, progress and prospects. Abingdon: Routledge.

Department for Communities and Local Government 2008. Communities in control: real people, real power. London: The Stationery Office.

Department for Communities and Local Government 2011. The audit and inspection of local authorities. Memorandum from the Department for Communities and Local Government submitted to the CLG Commons Select Committee.

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions 1998. Modernising local government: improving services through best value. London: The Stationary Office.

Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions 1999. Draft protocol for intervention in failing councils. London: DETR.

Downe, J., Martin, S.J. 2006. Joined Up Policy in Practice? The Coherence and Impacts of the Local Government Modernisation Agenda. Local Government Studies 32(4): 465-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03003930600793045

Downe, J., Martin, S.J. 2007. Regulation inside government: processes and impacts of inspection of local public services. Policy and Politics 35(2): 215-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557307780712997

Downe, J.D. 2008. Inspection of local government services. In: Davis, H. and Martin S.J. (eds) Public Services Inspection in the UK. Jessica Kingsley, London.

Downe, J.D., Grace, C.L, Martin, S.J., Nutley, S.M. 2010. Theories of public service improvement: A comparative analysis of local performance assessment frameworks. Public Management Review. 12(5): 663-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14719031003633201

Fender, J., Watt, P. 2002. Should Central Government Seek to Control the Level of Local Authority Expenditures? Fiscal Studies 23(2): 265-285.

Grace, C.L. 2010. From the Improvement End of the Telescope: Benchmarking and Accountability in UK Local Government. Paper presented to the Forum des Federations Conference, Melbourne, October.

H. M. Treasury 2010. Public Expenditure Statistical Analyses 2010. London: HMSO.

Hayden, C. Jenkins, L. Rikey, B. Martin, S.J. Downe, J. Lee Chan, D. McLartyn, K. Pierce, A., Collins, B. 2010. Comprehensive Area Assessment: an evaluation of year 1. Shared Intelligence: London.

Hood, C., Peters, G. 2004. The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14(3): 267-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh019

House of Commons 2010. Localism Bill. London: House of Commons.

Humphrey, J.C. 2002. A scientific approach to politics? On the trail of the Audit Commission. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 13(1): 39â62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2000.0490

IDeA 2009. Setting the pace: Developing a framework for sector-led help. London: IDeA.

Jacobs, R., Goddard, M. 2007. How do Performance Indicators Add up? Public Money and Management 27(2): 103-110.

LGMB 1997. Flexible working: Working patterns in local authorities and the wider economy. London: LGMB.

Local Government Association 2011. Taking the lead: self regulation and improvement in local government. London: LGA.

Lowdnes, V. 2002. Between rhetoric and reality: Does the 2001 White paper reverse the centralising trend in Britain? Local Government Studies. 28(3): 135-147.

Martin, S.J. 2009b. Engaging with citizens and other stakeholders' in Public Management and Governance. In: Bovaird, A.G. and Loeffler, E. (eds). London: Routledge.

Martin, S.J. 2009a. The state of local services: performance improvement in local government. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.

Martin, S.J., Downe, J.D., Grace, C.L., Nutley, S.M. 2010. Validity, Utilization and Evidence-based Policy: the Development and Impact of Performance Improvement Regimes in Local Public Services. Evaluation. 16(1): 31-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356389009350119

McLean, I, Haubrich, D., Gutierrez-Romero, R. 2007. The Perils and Pitfalls of Performance Measurement. Public Money and Management 27(2): 111-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2007.00566.x

McSweeney, B. 1988. Accounting for the Audit Commission. The Political Quarterly. 29(1): 28â43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1988.tb02379.x

ODPM/H.M. Treasury 2005. Securing Better Outcomes: Developing a New Performance Management Framework. London: HM Treasury.

Rao, N., Young. K. 1995. Competition, contracts and change: the local authority experience of CCT. London: LGC Communications.

Society of Local Authority Chief Executives 2011. Member Briefing 28th January 2011. London: Solace.

Stewart, J. 2003. Modernising British local government: an assessment of Labour's reform programme. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

Travers, T. 2004. Local government finance: busy going nowhere? in Stoker, G. and Wilson, D. (eds) British Local Government into the 21st Century, 151-164. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

van Thiel, S. and Leeuw, F.L. 2002. The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector. Public Performance and Management Review 25(3): 267-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3381236

Vincent-Jones, P. 1999. Competition and contracting in the transition from CCT to Best Value: towards a more reflexive regulation. Public Administration 77(2): 273-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00154

Walker, D. 1998. The new local government agenda: a response. Public Money and Management. 18(1): 4-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00095

Walsh, K. and H. Davis 1993. Competition and service: the impact of the Local Government Act 1988. London: HMSO.

Walsh, K., Deakin, N. Smith, P., Spurgeon, P., Thomas, N. 1997. Contracting for change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wilson, D. 2003. Unravelling control freakery: redefining central-local government relations. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5(3): 317-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00109

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i8/9.2412