Aligning BIM with FM: streamlining the process for future projects

Colleen Kasprzak
Craig Dubler


A study performed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA in 2004 found that owners account for approximately $10.6 billion of the $15.8 billion total inadequate interoperability costs of U.S. capital facility projects in 2002. Because of these inefficiency costs, it becomes vital that information produced during the design and construction phases of a project be transferred into operations with maximum leverage to the end users. However, very few owners have defined these informational needs or developed an integration strategy into existing maintenance management systems. To increase operational efficiency, an organization must first develop an understanding of their operating systems, as well as identify how Building Information Modeling (BIM) will add value to their daily tasks.

The Pennsylvania State University (PSU) has a unique opportunity to diversely implement BIM processes because not only does the University act as an owner, but also as designer and construction manager on the majority of projects. The struggle that PSU faces is one that is unique only to owners with a large, existing, multifaceted building inventory. This paper outlines the current initiative by the Office of Physical Plant (OPP), the asset manager at PSU, to develop an information exchange framework between BIM and FM applications to be used internally. As a result of this research, PSU has been able to define owner operational requirements for future projects and develop a flexible integration framework to support additional BIM tasks and information exchanges.


Building Information Modeling, Facility Management, Owner, Processes

Full Text:



Ballesty, S. (2006) 'An Integrated Collaborative Approach for FM-Sydney Opera House Exemplar', Cooperative Research Center for Construction Innovation, Brisbane, Australia

Becerik-Gerber, B., Rice, S. (2010) 'The perceived value of Building Information Modeling in the U.S. Building Industry', ITcon, 15, 185

Bernstein P. and Pittman, J. (2004) 'Barriers to the Adoption of Building Information Modeling in the Building Industry' Autodesk White Paper Retrieved from BIM Barriers to the Adoption of BIM in the Building Industry.pdf

Computer Integrated Construction (CIC) Research Group (2009) 'BIM Project Execution Planning Guide', (Oct. 9, 2009)

CRC Construction Innovation (2007) Adopting BIM for Facilities Management: Solutions for Managing the Sydney Opera House, Cooperative Research Center for Construction Innovation, Brisbane, Australia

Dubler, C.R., Messner, J., and Anumba, C.J. (2010) 'Using Lean Theory to Identify Waste Associated with Information Exchanges on a Building Project', Proceedings Construction Research Congress / ASCE Conference

Dubler, C.R., Kreider, R., Kasprzak, C., and Messner, J., (2010) 'Project Execution Planning for Building Information Modeling', Construction Industry Institute (CII) Research Summary RES-CPF 2010-1, July, Austin, TX

East, E. William (2010) 'March 2010 COBie Challenge', National Facility Management & Technology Tradeshow, Baltimore, MD

Gallaher, M. P., O'Connor, A. C., John L. Dettbarn, J., and Gilday, L. T. (2004) 'Cost analysis of inadequate interoperability in the U.S. capital facilities industry', National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

Smith, D. K. (2009) The USC School of Cinematic Arts: The Arrival of Spring in the Facilities Industry', Journal of Building Information Modeling, Spring 2009