Formulation of Generic Simulation Models for Analyzing Construction Claims

Rifat Rustom


While there are several techniques for analyzing the impact of claims on time schedule and productivity,very few are considered adequate and comprehensive to consider risks and uncertainties.A generic approach for claims analysis using simulation is proposed. The formulation of the generic methodology presented in this paper depends on three simulation models;As-Planned Model (APM),As-Built Model (ABM), and What-Would-HaveBeenModel(WWHBM). The proposed generic methodology as presented in this paper provides a good basis as a more elaborate approach to better analyze claims and their impacts on project time and productivity utilizing discrete event simulation.The approach proposed allows for scenario analysis to account for the disputed events and workflow disruptions. The proposed models will assist claimants in presenting their cases effectively and professionally.

Full Text:



AbouRizk, Simaan, M. & Dozzi, P. (1993). Application of computer simulation in resolving construction disputes, J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 119(2).

Alkass, S., Mazerolle, M., Tribaldos, E., & Harris, F. (1995). Computer aided construction delay analysis and claims preparation. Constr. Mgmt. and Economics, 13(4), 335-352.

ARENA, (2005). Rockwell Automation, Inc. URL null

4 Assaf, S. A., Alkhalil, M., & AI-Hazmi M. (1995). Causes of delay in large building construction projects. J. of Mgmt. in Engrg., ASCE, 11{2), 45-50."

Bramble, B. B., D'Onofrio, M.F. & Stetson, J. B. (1990). Avoiding and resolving construction claims. R.S. Means Company, Inc.

Brennan, F. & D'Onofrio, M. (2002). News from CPMI on construction claims analysis and resolution. Cause & Effect. Issue 1, spring. Capital Project Management, Inc.

Bubshait, A. and Cunningham, M. (1998). Comparison of delay analysis methodologies, J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 124(4), 315- 322.

Cor, H. (1998}. Using simulation to quantify the impacts of changes in construction work. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute. Virginia, USA.

Easton, G. R. (1989). Construction claims.Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Loughborough University, U.K.

European Construction Institute. (1996). Implementing total quality in construction industry. Thomas Telford, London.

Kartam, S. (1999). Generic methodology for analyzing delay claims. J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 125(6), 409-419.

Kululanga, G. K., Kuotcha, W., McCaffer, R., & Edum-Fotwe, F. (2001). Construction contractors' claim process framework. J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 127(4), 309-314.

Levin, P. (1998). Construction contract claims, changes, and dispute resolution. 2d edition. ASCE Press."

McDonald, P. R. & Baldwin, G. C. (1989}. Builder's and contractors handbook of construction claims. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Maio, C., Schexnayder, C., Knutson, K., & Weber, S. (2000). Probability distribution functions for construction simulation. J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, 126(4), 285-292.

Ogunlana, S.O. & Promkunton, K. (1996). Construction delays in a fast-growing economy: comparing Thailand with other economies. Int. J. of Proj. Mgmt., 14(1), 37-45.

Vanegas, Jorge A. & Halpin, Daniel W. (1993). Use of Construction Simulation in Claims Analysis, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Anaheim, California, June.