Modeling the Design Team as a Temporary Management Structure: Reality versus Theory
The focus of the cost management literature is almost exclusively on technical issues, with scant attention to its social, political and organisational dimensions. In this paper the authors document research examining the design team as a temporary management structure, with emphasis on the efficacy of the cost management system as a vehicle for attaining client objectives with respect to time, cost and quality. Soft systems methodology is used to explore the perceptions of stakeholders to the cost management system, thus developing conceptual models of the theory and practice of cost management. Significant differences were found to exist between the perceptions of individual stakeholders concerning design team participants, participants’ roles, and the very purpose of the cost management system. Recommendations are made for structural, attitudinal and procedural changes to the cost management system in order to facilitate its effective functioning in the achievement of the client’s needs and objectives.
Bowen, P.A. (1993). A communication-based approach to price modelling and price forecasting in the design phase of the traditional building procurement process in South Africa. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Port Elizabeth.
Bowen, P.A., and Edwards, P.J. (1998) Building cost planning and cost information management in South Africa. Journal of Construction Procurement, 4(1), 16-26.
Bowen, P.A., Pearl, R.G. and Edwards, P.J. (1999). Client briefing processes and procurement method selection: a South African study. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 6(2), 91-104.
Checkland, P.B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Checkland, P.B. and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Flanagan, R. and Tate, B. (1997). CostControl in Building Design. BlackwellScientific, Oxford.
Flood, R.L. and Jackson, M.C. (1991). Creative Problem-Solving: Total Systems Intervention. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Franks, J. (1990) Building Procurement Systems (2nd edition). Chartered Institute of Building, Englemere, Ascot, Berkshire.
Gharajedaghi, J. (1985). Towards a Systems Theory of Organisation. Intersystems Publications, Pennsylvania.
Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research (Edited by N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln), Sage, California.
Hall, K.A. (1998). A Systems-Based Evaluation of Cost Planning and Cost Control in the Design Phase of the Traditional Building Procurement Process in South Africa. Unpublished M.Phil. Degree, Department of Construction Economics and Management, University of Cape Town.
Hancock, M.R., Yap, C.K. and Root, D.S. (1996). Human resource development in large construction companies, in The Organization and Management of Construction: Shaping Theory and Practice (Edited by D.A. Langford and A. Retik), E. & F.N. Spon Ltd., London, 1, 312-321.
Loosemore, M. (1994). Problembehaviour. Construction Management and Economics. 12(6), 511-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446199400000062
Marsden, P. (1996). The changing role of the Australian quantity surveyor. The Building Economist, September, 5-9.
Masterman, J.W.E. (1992) An Introduction to Building Procurement Systems. E. & F.N. Spon Ltd., London.
Patching, D. (1990). Practical Soft Systems Analysis. Pitman, London.
Pearl, R.G., Akintoye, A., Bowen, P.A. and Hardcastle, C. (2003). Analysis of tender sum forecasting by quantity surveyors and contractors in South Africa. Acta Structilia, 10(1 & 2), 5-34.
Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Second Edition, Blackwell, Oxford.
Seymour, D. and Rooke, J. (1995). The culture of the industry and the culture of research. Construction Management and Economics. 13(6), 511-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446199500000059