Innovation Performance and Its Impact on Profitability Among Different Sectors in the Australian Construction Industry

Mary Hardie, Graham Miller, Karen Manley, Stephen McFallan


Abstract

The BRITE (Building Research Information Technology and Environment) project was established by the Australian Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation to encourage innovation in the construction industry. While innovation is generally perceived to be broadly beneficial, there has been little formal study of its occurrence or impact in Australian construction or of the factors which foster an innovative atmosphere within an enterprise. In order to benchmark innovation performance, the BRITE project conducted a survey in 2004 into the nature, incidence and variety of technological and organisational innovations in various sectors of the industry. With some exceptions, the survey found that clients and consultants engaged in significantly higher levels of innovation than did suppliers, main contractors or trade contractors. Within the industry sectors those organisations classified as high innovators favoured the adoption of advanced management practices and had formal evaluation systems in place to judge their progress. They reported significant positive impacts on their profitability from innovation and can therefore provide instructive examples for the rest of the industry to follow.

Full Text

PDF

References

Abd El Halim, O. A., and Haas, R. (2004). Process and Case Illustration of Construction Innovation." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(4), 570-575." http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:4(570)

Arditi, D., Kale, S., and Tangkar, M. (1997). Innovation in construction equipment and its flow into the construction industry." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(4), 371-378." http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:4(371)

Blayse, A. M., and Manley, K. (2004). Key influences on construction innovation." Construction Innovation, 4(3), 143-154."

BRITE Report 2004. Edited by Manley, K. Cooperative Research Centre for Construction Innovation Brisbane Australia. Available at http://www.brite.crcci.info/publications/index.htm Last accessed 28 December 2005.

Flynn, M., Dooley, L., O'Sullivan, D., and Cormican, K. (2003). Idea management for organisational innovation." International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 417-442." http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000878

Fraser, C., and Zarkada-Fraser, A. (2001). The philosophy, structure and objectives of research and development in Japan." Construction Management & Economics, 19(8), 831-840." http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446190110074255

Gann, D. (2000). Building Innovation, Complex Constructs in a Changing World, Thomas Teleford Publishing, London. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/bicciacw.25967

Gann, D. M. (2003). Guest editorial: innovation in the built environment." Construction Management & Economics, 21(6), 553 - 555." http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000134084

Kangari, R., and Miyatake, Y. (1997). Developing and managing innovative construction technologies in Japan." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 123(1), 72-78." http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:1(72)

Slaughter, E. S. (2000). Implementation of construction innovations." Building Research and Information, 28(1), 2-17." http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/096132100369055

Statistics New Zealand. (2004). Innovation in New Zealand." Statistics New Zealand, Wellington."

Steele, J., and Murray, M. (2004). Creating, supporting and sustaining a culture of innovation." Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(5), 316 - 322." http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09699980410558502

van der Panne, G., van Beers, C., and Kleinknecht, A. (2003). Success and Failure of Innovation: A Literature Review." International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 309-338." http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000830

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM