A comparison of subscription and open access journals in construction management and related fields

Main Article Content

Bo-Christer Bjork

Abstract

The Internet has profoundly changed the technical infrastructure for the publishing of scientific peer reviewed journals. The traditional business model of selling the content to subscribers is increasingly being challenged by Open Access journals, which are either run at low cost by voluntary academics or which sell dissemination services to authors. In addition authors in many fields are taking advantage of the legal possibilities of uploading free manuscript versions to institutional or subject-based repositories, in order to increase readership and impact. Construction Management is lagging behind many other fields in utilising the potential of the web for efficient dissemination results, in particular to academics outside the leading universities in industrialised countries. This study looks closer at the current publishing situation in construction management and related fields and compares empirical data about 16 OA journals and 16 traditional subscription journals. Of the articles published in 2011 in the subscription journals only 9 % could be found as OA copies. The overall OA availability (including article in OA journals) was 14 % for Construction Management and Economics and 29 for construction IT scholarship.

 

Article Details

How to Cite
Bjork, B.-C. (2012). A comparison of subscription and open access journals in construction management and related fields. Construction Economics and Building, 12(2), 42. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v12i2.2560
Section
Articles (Peer reviewed)