A Human Perspective of Contractor Prequalification
The contractor prequalification topic has had much written on it over the last two decades. In the past it has been primarily viewed in terms of the appropriate selection of contractors for construction projects. There has been extensive research interest into the functional and process driven aspects of contractor prequalification. However, there has been little research taking a more holistic view of contractor prequalification in terms of the human aspects that surround it. Hence, gaining a wider appreciation on how prequalification systems affect the major stakeholders seems warranted. The use of soft systems thinking allowed for an in-depth and contextual analysis of prequalification issues. This necessitated unstructured in-depth interviews to be carried out with senior industry practitioners. Sifting through their respective experiences allowed for an alternative view of contractor prequalification systems. It allowed a very human perspective of prequalification to emerge. The research suggests that viewing prequalification systems from a human perspective provides a fuller picture of their true benefits and limitations.
Al-Harbi, K. M. Al-S. (2001) Application of the AHP in Project Management, The International Journal of Project Management, 19 (1), 19-27"
Bouma, G. D. and Ling, R. (2004) The Research Process, Fifth Edition, Oxford University Press
Checkland, P. (2000) Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective, Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 17 (1), 11-58"
Cheng, E. W. L. and Li, H. (2004) Contractor Selection Using the Analytic Network Process, Construction Management and Economics, 22 (10), 1021-1032"
Construction Industry Development Agency (CIDA) (1994) The Australian Construction Industry Prequalification Criteria for Contractors and Subcontractors, Sydney, NSW, 1-74
Daellenbach, H. G. (2003) Systems Thinking and Management Science, REA Publications
El-Sawalhi, N., Eaton, D. and Rustom, R. (2007) Contractor Prequalification Model: State-Of-The-Art, International Journal of Project Management, 25 (5), 465-474"
Flick, U., von Kardorff, E. and Ines, S. (2004) A Companion to Qualitative Research, Sage Publications
Fontana, A. and Frey, J. H. (2003) The Interview: from Structured Questions to Negotiated Text, Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, 2nd Edition, Editors: Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., Sage Publications"
Hickey, A. M. and Davis, A. M. (2003) Elicitation Technique Selection: How do Experts do it? Requirements Engineering Conference, 11th IEEE International, 2003, 169-178"
Holt, G. (2010) Contractor selection innovation: examination of two decades' published research, Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, 10 (3), 304-328"
Jennings, P. and Holt, G. D. (1998) Prequalification and Multi-Criteria Selection: A Measure of Contractors Opinions, Construction Management and Economics, 16 (6), 651-660"
Lam, K. C., Hu, T. S. and Ng, S. T. (2005) Using the Principle Component Analysis Method as a Tool in Contractor Prequalification, Construction Management and Economics, 23 (7), 673-684"
Latham, M. (1994) Constructing the Team, Final Report of the Government/Industry Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the UK Construction Industry, HMSO, London, 1-129
Li, S., Foulger, J. R, and Phillips, P. W. (2008) Analysis of the Impacts of the Number of Bidders Upon Bid Values: Implications for Contractor Prequalification and Project Timing and Bundling, Public Works Management and Policy, 12 (3), 503-514"
Lo, W., Krizek, R. J. and Hadavi, A. (1999) Effects of High Prequalification Requirements, Construction Management and Economics, 17 (5), 603-612"
Mangitung, D. M. and Emsley, M. W. (2002) Decision Criteria for Periodic Qualification in the UK Construction Industry, Manchester Centre for Civil and Construction Engineering, University of Manchester, Institute of Science and Technology, 1-14
Metcalfe, M. (2006) Reading Critically, Sage Publications, London
Mills, A. J. (2005) Client and Contractor Attitudes to Prequalification, American Association of Cost Engineers International Conference, New Orleans, 2005, 1-23"
Minchin, R. E. and Smith, G. R. (2001) Quality Based Performance Rating of Contractors for Pre- qualification and Bidding Purposes â National Research Council, Pennsylvania State University, 1-9
Moore, N. (2000) How to do Research: The Complete Guide to Designing and Managing Research Projects, 3rd Edition, Library Association Publishing
Ng, S. T. (2001) EQUAL: A Case Based Contractor Prequalifier, Automation in Construction, 10 (4), 443-457"
Ng, S. T., Skitmore, M., R. and Smith, N. J. (1999) Decision-makers Perceptions in the Formulation of Prequalification Criteria", Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 6 (2), 155-165"
Nga, S. T. and Luub, C. D. T. (2008) Modeling subcontractor registration decisions through case-based reasoning approach, Automation in Construction, 17 (7), 873-881"
Ngai, S. C., Drew, D. S., Lo, H. P. and Skitmore, M. (2002) A Theoretical Framework for Determining the Minimum Number of Bidders in Construction Bidding Competitions, Construction Management and Economics, 20 (6), 473-482"
Ogunsemi, D. R. (2006) An Evaluation of Contractors' Selection Criteria for Different Tendering and Procurement Methods in Nigeria, Australasian University Building Educators Association Conference, University of Technology â Sydney, 2006, 1-17
Palaneeswaran, E. and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2000) Contractor Selection for Design/Build Projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, A.S.C.E., 126 (5), 331-339"
Palaneeswaran, E. and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2005) Web-Based Client Advisory Decision Support System for Design-Builder Prequalification, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 19 (1), 69-82"
Palaneeswaran, E., Ng, T. and Kumaraswamy, M. (2006) Client Satisfaction and Quality Management Systems in Contractor Organizations, Building and Environment, 41 (11), 1557-1570"
Pongpeng, J. and Liston, J. (2003) Contractor Ability Criteria: A View from the Thai Construction Industry", Construction Management and Economics, 21 (3), 267-282, " http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000049647
Prichard, R. G. (2000) Contractor Qualification, Retrieved from http://www.irmi.com/ expert/articles/2000/prichard08.aspx"
Russell, J. S. and Skibniewski, M. J. (1988) Decision Criteria in Contractor Prequalification, Journal of Management in Engineering, A.S.C.E., 4 (2), 148-164"
Schoderbek, P. P., Schoderbek, C. G. and Kefalas, A. G. (1990) Management Systems, Conceptual Considerations, 4th Edition, BPI Irwin
Singh, D. and Tiong, R. L. K. (2005) A Fuzzy Decision Framework for Contractor Selection, The Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131 (1), 62-70"
Skinner D., Tagg, C. and Holloway, J. (2000) Managers and Research: The Pros and Cons of Qualitative Approaches, Management Learning, 31 (2), 163-179"
Sonmez, M., Holt, G. D., Yang, J. B. and Graham, G. (2002) Applying Evidential Reasoning to Prequalifying Construction Contractors, Journal of Management in Engineering, A.S.C.E., 18 (3), 111-119"
Ticehurst, G. W. and Veal, A. J. (2000) Business Research Methods â A Managerial Approach, Longman
Topcu, Y. I. (2004) A Decision Model Proposal for Construction Contractor Selection in Turkey, Building and Environment, 39 (4), 469-481"
Wong, H. C. (2004) Contractor Performance Prediction Model for the United Kingdom Construction Contractor: Study of Logistic Regression Approach, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, A.S.C.E., 130 (5), 691-698"
Wright, L. T. (1996) Exploring the In-depth Interview as a Qualitative Research Technique with American and Japanese Firms, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 14 (6), 59-64"
Zulauf, C. A. (2004) Systems Thinking: You Can Be More Proactive, Executive Excellence, 21 (7), 13"
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM