Quantitative Analysis of Criteria in University Building Maintenance in Malaysia
University buildings are a significant part of university assets and considerable resources are committed to their design, construction and maintenance. The core of maintenance management is to optimize productivity and user satisfaction with optimum resources. An important segment in the maintenance management system is the analysis of criteria that influence building maintenance. Therefore, this paper aims to identify quantify, rank and discuss the criteria that influence maintenance costs, maintenance backlogs, productivity and user satisfaction in Malaysian university buildings. The paper reviews the related literature and presents the outcomes of a questionnaire survey. Questionnaires were administered on 50 university maintenance organizations. Thirty-one criteria were addressed to the university maintenance organizations to evaluate the degree to which each of the criteria influences building maintenance management. With a 66% response rate, it was concluded that the consideration of the criteria is critical to the university building maintenance management system. The quality of components and materials, budget constraints and the age of the building were found to be the most influential criteria but information on user performance satisfaction, problems associated with in-house workforce and shortage of materials and components were the least influential criteria. The paper also outlined that maintenance management is a strategic function in university administration.
Amaratunga, D. and Baldry, D. (2000) Assessment of facilities management performance in higher education properties, Facilities, 18 (7/8), 293-301"
Bartholomew (2008) Building on knowledge: developing expertise, creativity and intellectual capital in the construction professional. UK: Blackwell Publishing Limited
Buys, F. and Nkado, R. (2006) A benchmark model for maintenance management systems in South African tertiary education institutions, Proceedings of the Annual Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (COBRA 2006), Edited by Elaine Silver, University College London 7th and 8th September 2006
El-Haram, M, A and Horner, M. W. (2002) Factors affecting housing maintenance cost, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 8 (2), 115-123"
Green, D. and Turrell, P. (2005) Schools buildings investment and impact on pupil performance, Facilities, 23 (5/6), 253-261"
Housley, J. (1997) Managing the estate in higher education establishments, Facilities, 15 (3/4), 72-83"
Lavy, S. and Bilbo, D. L. (2009) Facilities maintenance management in large public schools, Texas, Facilities, 27 (1/2), 5-20"
Miller, B. A. (2007) Assessing organizational performance in higher education, USA: John Wiley and Sons, Inc
Nordin, M. K. (2010) Private-finance initiative can save government RM 500 million. The Star, 5 May 2010. N4
Olanrewaju, A. A. (2010). Maintenance Management of University Buildings, Article accepted for publication in Journal of Building Appraisal."
Price, I. F., Matzdorf, F., Smith, L. and Agahi, H. (2003) The impact of facilities on the student choice of university, Facilities, 21 (10), 212-222"
Rawlinson, S. and Brett, L. (2009) Cost model universities, Building Magazine, Available at http://www.building.co.uk/data/cost-model-universities/3143057.article, Accessed on 15 June 2010
Sekeran, U. and Bougie, R. (2010) Research methods for business: a skill building approach, Fifth Edition, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Limited
Shen, Q.P., Lo, K.K. and Wang, Q. (1998) Priority setting in maintenance management of public buildings -a modified multi-attribute approach using analytic hierarchy Process, Construction Management and Economics, 16 (6), 693-702"
Springer, T. M. and Waller, N. G. (1996) Maintenance of residential rental property: an empirical analysis, The Journal of Real Estate Research Volume, 12 (1), 89-99"
Metrics powered by PLOS ALM