The Use of Engineering Sketching and Journaling to Foster Deep Understanding of Construction: an Exploratory Study

R Siew
L Bernold


In today’s teaching environment where students’ main focus is on getting a high mark for a class, deep understanding has taken a backseat. Being able to answer as many exam preparation questions as possible and fulfilling all the criteria on an assignment will guarantee success. “I deserve a higher mark because I worked hard in this class,” are the arguments one hears after the final marks are published. How about understanding the new material presented in the class? Engineering sketching and journaling have been hailed by experienced engineers as tools to enhance thinking and communication. The authors of the paper report about their utilization as teaching tools to foster deep understanding in a course on construction equipment and methods. While topics like equipments economics, power transmission and safety benefit from graphing in two-axis coordinate systems, understanding the best path of a backhoe bucket during a trenching operation is impossible to describe in words. Of course, understanding has several components: a) WHY do we use a backhoe excavator and not a trencher, b) WHAT are the possible three link motion paths and their related force vectors, c) HOW can the operator control the path of the bucket, and d) WHAT-IF there are utilities buried in the ground?

Full Text:



Graham, R. (2004). Rhetoric for Engineers: Hand sketching, viewed 15 January 2012, URL: html

Hyland, K. (2002). 'Genre-based Pedagogies: A Social Response to Process.' Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17-29.

Jacobs, B.J. and Brown, T.A. (2004). 'Addressing inequities in engineering sketching skills, creating flexible learning environments.' Proc., 5th Australasian Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education and the 10th Australasian Women in Engineering Forum, pp.18-28.

Kardos, G. (1997). Drawings in engineering design, viewed on 23 January 2012,

Lane, D., Seery, N. and Gordon, S. (2011). 'A Paradigm for promoting visual synthesis through feedback sketching.' Design and Technology Education, 15, 68-90.

MacDonald, S.P. and Cooper, C.M. (1992). 'Contributions of academic and dialogic journals to writing about literature' in Writing, teaching and learning in the disciplines, eds., A. Herrington & C. Moran , Modern Language Association, New York, pp. 137â155.

Sobek, D.K. (2002). 'Use of journals to evaluate student design processes.' Proc., the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education, U.S.

Southavilay, V., Yacef, K. and Calvo, R.A. (2010). 'Process mining to support student's collaborative writing in education.' Proc., Educational Data Mining Conference, 11 -13 June, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. pp. 257-266.

Tynjala, P. and Mason, L. (2001). Writing as a learning tool: integrating theory and practice, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands.

Tversky, B. (2000). 'Levels and structure of cognitive mapping.' Proc., Cognitive mapping: Past, present and future, eds., R. Kitchin & S. M. Freundschuh, Routledge, London.

Varley, P. and Company, P. (2008) Automated Sketching and Engineering Culture, Sketch Tools for Diagramming Workshop, 15 September 2008, Germany.

Weekes, H. (2005). 'Drawing students out: using sketching exercises to hone observation Skills.' The Science Teacher, 72, 34.

Zacharias, M. E. (1991). 'The relationship between journal writing in education and thinking processes; what educators say about it?' Education, 112, 265-270.

Zimmerman, B.J. (1999). 'Acquiring writing skills: shifting from process to outcome self-regulatory goals.' Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 241-250.



  • There are currently no refbacks.